TL;DR
Turn your wind-down time into listening time
- Thousands of audiobooks, podcasts and originals
- Listen on your phone, tablet or Echo — also offline
- Cancel anytime
A personal essay published in the Kenyon Review in 2025 examines whether a mother’s Alzheimer’s diagnosis should change how her children interpret years of painful family memories. The writer describes the diagnosis as opening a possible explanation, not proving which past behaviors were symptoms or resolving the family’s questions.
A 2025 essay in the Kenyon Review examines whether a mother’s Alzheimer’s diagnosis should change how her children understand their upbringing, describing the diagnosis as a possible explanation for painful memories rather than proof of what caused them. The writer, Chengela, says the family’s history remains difficult to interpret because some behaviors can be associated with dementia but may also reflect personality or other circumstances.
Chengela’s account centers on a mother who, after developing dementia, spends hours talking to dolls she treats as her daughters. At meals, she sometimes asks whether the dolls know it is time to eat; her husband reassures her that they have already eaten. The writer describes sitting beside her mother and being ignored. These scenes frame the essay’s question about how a diagnosis changes the meaning of earlier family experiences.
Before the diagnosis, Chengela and her sister felt distant from their mother, whom the writer recalls as withdrawn, at times volatile, and often inattentive to the children. Afterward, their father pointed to what he said were two relevant facts: the mother’s neurological degeneration was already beyond a moderate level when she was diagnosed in her early fifties, and Alzheimer’s symptoms, including personality changes, can begin years before diagnosis. Those statements are presented as the father’s explanation, not as proof that particular childhood experiences were caused by the disease.
The writer revisits specific memories, including the mother’s criticism, difficulty making decisions and lack of interest in the children’s daily lives. Chengela considers whether each might have been a symptom, then recognizes that the same behavior could have other explanations. The essay does not resolve the question of which behaviors were illness-related.
A Diagnosis Changes Family Narratives
The essay matters because a diagnosis can change how relatives interpret years of behavior, even when it cannot establish exactly what caused each incident. For Chengela, the possibility that dementia affected the mother’s personality creates an alternative account of the past: distance and anger may have been illness-related rather than deliberate. But accepting that account can also put pressure on the children to reconsider their judgments and forgive, despite the uncertainty.
The writer does not argue that a diagnosis should have no bearing on family history. Instead, the essay shows the difficulty of treating a possible medical explanation as a complete account of a relationship. Acknowledging that illness may have played a role does not erase the children’s memories or establish what their mother felt or intended. The distinction matters to readers dealing with illness in a family: explanation, accountability and reconciliation are not the same question.
Popular right now
TCL QM64L 85-Inch QD-Mini LED 4K Smart Fire TV
Vitamix Propel Series 750 Professional-Grade Blender, 4 Programs, Black
Ninja Foodi 10-Qt DualZone Smart XL Air Fryer, 6-in-1, DZ550
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Essay’s Earlier Family History
Chengela says the essay was published in the Kenyon Review in 2025 and was written much earlier. In a post sharing it, the writer says the republication restriction period had ended and explains that the essay draws on questions considered for about a decade: how far a diagnosis should reshape the past and whether biology requires reconciliation.
The writer’s family history includes a long separation: Chengela says they arrived in the United States as a small child after three years apart from their parents; the sister was not yet born at that point. The essay also notes that their father said little about what the mother had been like when younger, leaving the writer without enough information to compare her earlier personality with the later behavior.
Chengela uses a Zen parable about a collision with an empty boat to consider blame and illness. The image does not settle the family’s history; it captures the temptation to see a person’s behavior as beyond their control while leaving unanswered what the diagnosis can explain.
“How much should a medical diagnosis reshape the past?”
— Chengela, in the essay
What the Diagnosis Cannot Establish
The essay does not provide medical records, a detailed clinical timeline or an independent account of the mother’s earlier health. The reported claim that the mother’s degeneration was beyond a moderate level at diagnosis, and the father’s statement about symptoms potentially starting years earlier, are relayed by Chengela; the essay does not document how those points were assessed in her mother’s case.
It also remains unclear which remembered behaviors, if any, were caused or affected by dementia, depression or other factors. Chengela says the science of how and at what rate personality changes appear is not settled, and the available family information does not answer the question. The essay offers no final verdict on whether the children should forgive their mother or revise their memories.
The Question After Publication
The immediate development is the essay’s renewed availability after its author said the republication restriction period had lifted. The source provides no announcement of a follow-up article, response from the Kenyon Review, or new medical information about the mother.
For readers, the essay leaves its central question open rather than setting out a resolution. Chengela’s account ends with the limits of hindsight: a diagnosis may supply a framework for reconsidering the past, but the family cannot use that possibility alone to determine what every past action meant.
Key Questions
What is the 2025 essay about?
Chengela’s essay explores whether a mother’s Alzheimer’s diagnosis should change how her children interpret years of difficult family experiences. It focuses on the difference between a possible explanation and a proven cause.
What did the father say about the diagnosis?
According to Chengela, the father said the mother had already reached beyond a moderate level of neurological degeneration when diagnosed in her early fifties. He also pointed to the possibility that Alzheimer’s symptoms, including personality changes, can begin years before diagnosis. The essay does not independently verify how those statements apply to the mother’s earlier behavior.
Does the essay conclude that dementia caused the mother’s earlier behavior?
No. Chengela considers whether behaviors such as withdrawal, irritability and indecision could have been symptoms, but also recognizes that other explanations are possible. The essay leaves the cause of individual incidents unresolved.
Does Chengela argue that the children should forgive their mother?
The essay describes the pressure to reconsider judgments and forgive, but it does not give a definitive answer about whether reconciliation is required. Its central concern is how a diagnosis can alter a family’s account of the past without settling every question.
Source: chengela.substack.com
